The Trump administration has reportedly proposed defining gender as male and female, on a biological basis. Many conservatives are hailing the rumor with acclaim after the previous administration pushed to allow men in women’s bathrooms.
The New York Times allegedly obtained a memo by the Department of Health and Human Services that argues federal agencies should accept a gender definition that is based on a ‘biological basis that is clear, grounded in science, objective and administrable.”
“A series of decisions by the Obama administration loosened the legal concept of sex in federal programs, including in education and health care, recognizing sex largely as an individual’s choice — and prompting fights over bathrooms, dormitories, single-sex programs and other arenas where gender was once seen as a simple concept,” the Times explained.
The new proposal would define gender based on science, and help stop the rash of crimes created by the Obama administration’s acceptance of what was then considered, and still is by many, a mental disorder by leading experts.
“Sex means a person’s status as male or female based on immutable biological traits identifiable by or before birth,” the memo reportedly reads. “The sex listed on a person’s birth certificate, as originally issued, shall constitute definitive proof of a person’s sex unless rebutted by reliable genetic evidence.”
BizPac Review wrote, “While left-wing corporations such as Target would still be allowed to maintain so-called “transgender bathrooms” were this rule implemented, there would nevertheless at least be a federal standard in place guiding the rest of society toward the correct definition.”
“Moreover, the implementation of this rule would prompt an immediate end to non-science-based transgender stipulations currently in place in schools, prisons and homeless shelters.”
Two years ago, the Department of Housing and Urban Development ordered that transgender men could use, sleep at and shower in women’s homeless shelters. Likewise, transgender criminals were allowed to specify their prison according to their ‘feelings’ on gender.
The proposed rule could also put a halt to the transgender service members (like all… 3 of them?), undoing the Obama administration’s change in military policy.
In addition to the medical costs of providing sex-change surgery for transgender personnel, Defense Secretary James Mattis told the president in February that there are “substantial risks” connected to allowing people with gender dysphoria to serve in the military, and such a practice “could undermine readiness [and] disrupt unit cohesion.”
The news has stirred the left. Twitter was alive with couch warriors blasting the possible change today.
However, a large portion of the population is sick and tired of hearing about horrific crimes that were made possible by Obama’s whim, and think that the proposed change would be a benefit, not a harm to the safety and sanity of America.