The Hill is reporting on what has to be one of the worst proposals in the history of the United States of America. There are no shortage of bad ideas, especially when it comes to Democrats (though no one is immune), but a recent proposal put forth by Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) is so awful and impractical, it has to be worth the creation of new adjectives meaning “awful” just to set it apart. This House Democrat has introduced legislation that would “enhance the Constitution’s presidential removal procedures” based on how they feel about how Donald Trump acts. This takes their obsession with “feelings” to a whole new plateau.
Bumbling about during recess, Blumenauer used the break to file the bill, which we all know is when the most snarky politicians like to sneak in their most divisive ideas. The hope is usually that most sources are not paying as much attention, but in this instance, the legislation is far too outrageous to be ignored due to Spring Break. This bill “would empower” past Presidents and Vice Presidents of both parties (assuming that they can keep all third parties down forever) in tandem with the sitting Vice President to decide if the POTUS is fit to be in office. This means, “Let’s have the elites ALWAYS able to trump the votes of the masses who do not want us to still have any say,” and nothing more!
Just imagine it, Obama, the destroyer of Libya and healthcare, working with “WMD in Iraq” Bush to decide with Pence if Trump should be overthrown. This would be quite the lark except for the fact that Julian Assange of Wikileaks said that compenents in the U.S. government were hoping to use Vice President Pence to remove Trump from office and no one cared to report on it at all. The author of this article had his Twitter account (shown below) bombed as “bordering on fake news” for even REPORTING on the post from Assange, as if The Conservative Daily Post had made it up for no reason. Now today we see vindication as a House Democrat floats the idea. Thankfully, nothing suggests that Pence is biting.
— WashJourn (@WashingtonJourn) March 14, 2017
“It is hard to imagine a better group to work with the vice president to examine whether the president is able to discharge the duties of the office,” said Blumenauer, adding, “When there are questions about the president’s ability to fulfill his or her constitutional responsibilities, it is in the country’s best interest to have a mechanism in place that works effectively.” The glaring question here is, who in the seven hells of Dante decided that their Constitutional right to “examine whether the president is able” to do anything? Congress has a multitude of ways to impede a leader and none of them resemble this lunacy.
The only thing that this boneheaded idea is going to usher in is an age where each side of the isle uses such alliances to remove anyone who they dislike for any trumped up reason that they can think of. The DSM manual calls everything a “mental illness,” after all. Not only that, but what better way for a two-party system that (prior to Donald Trump) had no differences between them to retain NWO/United Nations control? The people of any party will have no say, and what’s more, should any third party ever get elected, he or she would be removed by such a block of power before the presidency even began. This is one step away from the theory that Vice President Johnson was in on the overthrow of JFK, something that lead to his death.
The wayward thinking Democrat is worried that the Constitution’s 25th Amendment, which says that “vice president assumes the Oval Office in the event that a president is removed from office, dies or resigns” is not enough to prove “mental or emotional capacity” issues. That is because THERE ARE NO ISSUES with Trump’s mind, just Blumenauer’s. He is the one who would rather call most of America crazy for electing Donald Trump than accept the fact that America detests his party’s platform. It was outright rejected and losing elections has repercussions. His real problem is that he does not know when to sit, licks his wounds, and quite frankly, shut up. His changing us into a parliamentary system just to stop a duly elected leader is close to how Hitler got so much power.
Now the founding document does allow for cabinet officials and the Vice President to declare Trump unfit. However, considering how loved Trump is (even after ruffling some feathers with his base recently), such a coup would be seen as the agenda driven tripe that civil war would likely erupt. Even if this happned, (and since we do NOT “border on fake news,” there is NO reports of this being the case), the President could still refuse. If so, a two-thirds vote fo the House and Senate would be needed to remove him. If this law existed in China, it may apply, but just because Trump follows the Constitution and people like this House Democrat hate those standards, that is not grounds for such a move.
Still, he goes onwards with his delusions by saying,”Because the cabinet can be fired by the president, there is a natural bias that would make them reluctant to acknowledge the president’s inability to serve. It’s time to revisit and strengthen the Amendment and make sure there is a reliable mechanism in place if the president becomes unable to discharge the powers and duties of office.” If ever anyone in recent memory has signed themselves up to be replaced at the earliest electatorial conveniencee, it is Mr. Earl Blumenauer. he actually makes people like House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) look sane and logical by comparison. That alone is ample grounds for removal from office.
While this will surely gain all the traction of Bambi’s first walk on the winter ice, it does work to show us in vivid detail how little the Democratic Party feels about the votes and will of the American people. That, if nothing else, should be all that anyone needs to know about not only this bill, but the Party as a whole. May shame be upon them.