PUBLISHED: 9:16 PM 6 Jul 2016
UPDATED: 1:23 AM 7 Jul 2016

That Man You Keep Seeing Is Now Coming Forward To Testify

He's Been Helping Her This Entire Time

635473474185722772_james_comey_fbi

There are a ton of people that smell the corruption in the air when it comes to the FBI and Hillary Clinton’s emails. While FBI Director James Comey may have given Hillary Clinton a free pass for her “extremely careless” use of a personal email server that placed the American people at risk, he did state that the FBI will recommend to the Justice Department that no charges be pressed.

Prior to this investigation, Director Comey was a well-respected man by both Republicans and Democrats, but his decision to let Clinton off the hook hasn’t gone over too well with Americans. Andrew McCarthy is a contributing editor at National Review, a former federal prosecutor, and a longtime friend of Comey’s that has been disgusted by what went down.

McCarthy wrote a piece for the National Review saying Comey was misconstruing the law and that Clinton was clearly chargeable. “There is no way of getting around this: According to Director James Comey (disclosure: a former colleague and longtime friend of mine), Hillary Clinton checked every box required for a felony violation of Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18),” McCarthy wrote in his piece.

McCarthy went on to write:

With lawful access to highly classified information she acted with gross negligence in removing and causing it to be removed it from its proper place of custody, and she transmitted it and caused it to be transmitted to others not authorized to have it, in patent violation of her trust. Director Comey even conceded that former Secretary Clinton was ‘extremely careless’ and strongly suggested that her recklessness very likely led to communications (her own and those she corresponded with) being intercepted by foreign intelligence services.

McCarthy argued that Comey’s statements surrounding Hillary Clinton’s intent were wrong, as well. “All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice,” FBI Director Comey said during Tuesday’s press conference. “We do not see those things here.”

McCarthy, along with millions of Americans, strongly disagreed.

“Director Comey recommended against prosecution of the law violations he clearly found on the ground that there was no intent to harm the United States,” McCarthy wrote.

“In essence, in order to give Mrs. Clinton a pass, the FBI rewrote the statute, inserting an intent element that Congress did not require. The added intent element, moreover, makes no sense: The point of having a statute that criminalizes gross negligence is to underscore that government officials have a special obligation to safeguard national defense secrets; when they fail to carry out that obligation due to gross negligence, they are guilty of serious wrongdoing,” he continued.

“I would point out, moreover, that there are other statutes that criminalize unlawfully removing and transmitting highly classified information with intent to harm the United States. Being not guilty (and, indeed, not even accused) of Offense B does not absolve a person of guilt on Offense A, which she has committed.”

There is going to continue to be thousands of opinions and questions surrounding this series of events, but one thing is certain: if this disgusts you and you do not want his woman to be president, all you have to do is beat her in the November election and she will be gone.