A second woman has accused Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh of inappropriate behavior. While speaking exclusively to the New Yorker, Deborah Ramirez admits having “significant gaps in her memories” regarding the alleged college party from 1983. The outlet also admits that Ramirez could not remember specific information or the alleged person, but after six days of consulting with a Democratic lawyer, Ramirez now believes Kavanaugh was the supposed man who exposed himself to her at a party while they attended Yale University.
The case has been unraveling since the New Yorker published the hit piece. For starters, Ramirez’s best friend dropped a bombshell on the claim: she and Kavanaugh attended Ramirez’s wedding and admitted that she, “never heard of it,” regarding the allegations.
The New Yorker not only admits that it “has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party,” Breitbart reports that the allegations were so shoddy that The New York Times and The Washington Post admitted to passing on the story.
Ramirez claimed to the New Yorker that she “became inebriated” and “was on the floor, foggy and slurring her words” during the 1983 party.
“Ramirez acknowledged that there are significant gaps in her memories of the evening. Her memories contained gaps because she had been drinking at the time of the alleged incident.”
After six days of consultation by a lawyer, who is a former Democratic state elected official, the outlet reports: “Ramirez said that she felt confident enough of her recollections to say that she remembers Kavanaugh had exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party.”
The New Yorker went on to admit that all of the witnesses Ramirez said were present have denied seeing or being aware of what she alleges Kavanaugh did at the party in question.
“One of the male classmates who Ramirez said egged on Kavanaugh denied any memory of the party. ‘I don’t think Brett would flash himself to Debbie, or anyone, for that matter,’ he said,” the outlet reported.
“I have no recollection,” a second eye-witness said.
Buried deep in the article, the New Yorker admits that it “has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party.”
Four Yale University graduates, who revealed they were friends with both Kavanaugh and Ramirez, said “with confidence” if the incident had ever occurred, they “would have seen or heard about it—and we did not.”
They also said the alleged inappropriate behavior “would be completely out of character for Brett,” and Ramirez never once mentioned the allegations until Kavanaugh was nominated for the Supreme Court.
“This is a woman I was best friends with. We shared intimate details of our lives,” added another woman, whose wedding both Ramirez and Kavanaugh attended. “And I was never told this story by her, or by anyone else. It never came up. I didn’t see it; I never heard of it happening.”
Kavanaugh has also vehemently denied the allegation:
“This alleged event from 35 years ago did not happen. The people who knew me then know that this did not happen, and have said so. This is a smear, plain and simple. I look forward to testifying on Thursday about the truth, and defending my good name – and the reputation for character and integrity I have spent a lifetime building – against these last-minute allegations.”
Ramirez miraculously “remembering” that Kavanaugh allegedly exposed himself to her in 1983 comes after Christine Blasey Ford claimed Kavanaugh groped her nearly 40 years ago while they were in college.
Kavanaugh, who strongly denies the allegations, plans to testify on Thursday before the Committee. Ford, after listing demands, finally agreed to testify as well, but it wouldn’t surprise many if she backed out again.
But more importantly, both of the women who have accused Kavanaugh of misconduct have major holes in their stories. Many, including Democrats, say they aren’t sure if Ford’s allegations are truthful.
And the New Yorker admitting Ramirez was inebriated, had “significant gaps in her memories,” and only “remembered” what she alleges Kavanaugh did after meeting with a Democratic lawyer for six days speaks volumes.
As many have argued, these smear tactics illustrate how low Democrats are willing to go to attack Kavanaugh and destroy his nomination.