SCOTUS Defies Churches

PUBLISHED: 1:40 PM 30 May 2020
UPDATED: 5:41 PM 30 May 2020

SCOTUS Rejects Constitutional Protection For Worship

This is insane, many experts argue, explaining that worship is one of the foundational aspects of the Constitution.

Roberts sided with the left. (Source: MSNBC YouTube Screenshot)

In a stunning, and many people argue, highly offensive and wrong decision, the Supreme Court rejected an emergency appeal by a California Church that objected to the state’s imposed restrictions on worship. The reason constitutional rights are being trampled—thanks to a flu virus that is NOT as deadly as the government has claimed—seem bizarre, and even more troubling was John Roberts’ rejection of the fundamental truths of the American Republic.

Fox News reported:

A divided Supreme Court on Friday rejected an emergency appeal by a California church that challenged state limits on attendance at worship services that have been imposed to contain the spread of the coronavirus.

Over the dissent of the four more conservative justices, Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court’s four liberals in turning away a request from the South Bay United Pentecostal Church in Chula Vista, California, in the San Diego area.

The church argued that limits on how many people can attend their services violate constitutional guarantees of religious freedom and had been seeking an order in time for services on Sunday. The church said it has crowds of 200 to 300 people for its services.

Chief Justice John Roberts joined the Supreme Court’s four liberals in turning away a request from the South Bay United Pentecostal Church in Chula Vista, Calif., in the San Diego area.

Roberts wrote in brief opinion that the restriction allowing churches to reopen at 25% of their capacity, with no more than 100 worshipers at a time, “appear consistent” with the First Amendment. Roberts said similar or more severe limits apply to concerts, movies and sporting events “where large groups of people gather in close proximity for extended periods of time.”

Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in dissent that the restriction “discriminates against places of worship and in favor of comparable secular businesses. Such discrimination violates the First Amendment.” Kavanaugh pointed to supermarkets, restaurants, hair salons, cannabis dispensaries and other businesses that are not subject to the same restrictions.

Lower courts in California had previously turned down the churches’ requests.

The court also rejected an appeal from two churches in the Chicago area that objected to Gov. Jay Pritzker’s limit of 10 worshipers at religious services. Before the court acted, Pritzker modified the restrictions to allow for up to 100 people at a time. There were no recorded dissents.