Force Treatment

PUBLISHED: 4:46 PM 5 Jun 2019
UPDATED: 4:48 PM 5 Jun 2019

San Francisco Goes Full Nazi: Homeless Offenders To Get Forced ‘Treatment’

Not having the ability to deny any sort of ‘treatment’ is a violation of personal liberty, but in liberal San Francisco, it’s for your own good.

More socialist policies to counteract the socialist policies that created the mess?

Have a giant homeless problem because of socialist policies that increase and foment the massive divide between the ultra-rich and ultra-poor? No problem… just add more socialist ‘solutions’ and strip away more rights from the people.

That’s exactly what San Francisco has done. To help combat the third-world poverty and crime that has been generated by decades of liberal rule, now mentally ‘ill’ homeless offenders will be forced into ‘treatment.’

The L.A. Times reported:

San Francisco officials decided Tuesday to force some people with serious mental illness and drug addiction into treatment, even if it goes against the spirit of a city known for its fierce protection of civil rights.

Several members of the Board of Supervisors voiced deep concerns about the possibility of taking away a person’s civil liberties, but the proposal for a pilot program passed 10 to 1.

Mayor London Breed and other supporters say the move — known as conservatorship — is necessary to help people who are often homeless, addicted to drugs and have a mental illness, making them a danger to themselves.

[It’s up to the democrat masters to take care of the slaves… it always has been…. Because slaves can’t take care of themselves and might be a ‘danger’ to themselves.]

“Allowing people to continue to suffer on our streets is not acceptable or humane, and I am glad the Board of Supervisors supported our approach to finally make a change,” Breed said in a statement after the vote.

The measure would apply to only a handful of people, the city’s department of public health estimated, although the number would grow under legislation pending at the state level.

Supervisor Shamann Walton was the sole no vote, saying the city didn’t have plans in place to reduce the impact on African American people and other minorities who tend to have negative run-ins with police.

Several supervisors decided to give the pilot program a try after changes were made that require providers to give the person multiple opportunities to accept voluntary help. They also were encouraged by Breed including more money for additional treatment beds in a proposed budget.

“By all accounts, the number of people affected will be small, but no matter how small the number, we all need to be watching closely to make sure the impacts are positive,” said Supervisor Vallie Brown, a co-sponsor of the proposal.

Critics call the measure politically driven and a violation of civil rights that runs against the principles of the liberal city. They say that it would lead to locking up people in facilities and that San Francisco lacks the resources to successfully expand the number of people in such a program.

“We are concerned about ensuring that persons receive mental health treatment and services in their communities, in supportive housing, in supportive environments — and not in facilities,” said Curt Child, legislative director of Disability Rights California.

“This is a major civil rights issue in the sense of confining people against their will,” he said.

San Francisco struggles with income inequality and a growing number of homeless people — some with disturbing behavior tied to drugs, schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. They shuffle from the streets to jail and psychiatric care, without steady treatment.

Supervisor Rafael Mandelman, another co-sponsor, says business owners and residents in his district see such people go “from ‘kind of not great’ to being in absolute and complete distress.”

Sen. Scott Wiener, a San Francisco Democrat, co-authored state legislation that allows pilot programs in Los Angeles, San Francisco and San Diego counties. He is working on changing that legislation to expand the number of people affected.

“Too many people are deteriorating and dying on San Francisco’s streets, and we have a moral responsibility to help them,” he said in a statement after the vote. “It’s neither progressive nor compassionate to stand by while people die.”

Supervisors in San Diego and Los Angeles counties have not officially considered the proposal. Los Angeles County saw a 12% rise in the number of homeless people over the past year.

So basically, being forced to accept treatment is for your own good, so you little people shut up about it and get in the Soylent Green line.

This is liberal-fornia. Building new ways to strip personal rights from citizens every day.