Brennan Buried Evidence

PUBLISHED: 1:30 PM 24 Apr 2020
UPDATED: 5:34 PM 24 Apr 2020

Obama CIA Chief Hid Evidence Putin Wanted Hillary As Senate Report Blasted

Why wouldn’t he? Given the Uranium One deal, why on earth wouldn’t Putin and Russia love to have a compliant Hillary in office, selling off more of America’s crucial nuclear resources? And, with the massive abuses of power surrounding the collusion hoax, evidence like this would have to be hidden.

The abuse of power, corruption, and dirty dealings seem to have no end. (Source: CBS News YouTube Screenshot)

In a shocking new op-ed piece written by former CIA officer and National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz, two revelations show that the Senate report, released just days ago, directly contradicted the findings concerning the Russian ‘strategy’ to interfere in the 2016 election for Donald Trump. In fac,t the opposite is true. According to Fleitz, Obama’s CIA Chief, John Brennan, actually buried the evidence that Putin wanted Hillary to win.

Given her previous agreement to assist in the sale of 20 percent of America’s nuclear resources to Russia, this actually makes sense, experts argue.

The Daily Caller reported:

Fleitz called Brennan “the most politicized intelligence chief in American history” in a Fox News op ed that addressed a report released Tuesday from the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. That document supports the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that Russia meddled in the 2016 presidential election to promote the victory of then-candidate Donald Trump.

The committee released the document in a highly edited form that does not include any reference to recently declassified files that point to a possible Russian disinformation campaign that attempted to malign Trump.

Fleitz notes that the Senate report directly contradicts the March 2018 findings of  the House Intelligence Committee, which accused the intelligence community assessment of being tainted by anti-Trump forces.

While recognizing that “the political establishment and anti-Trump journalists gloated about the new Senate Intelligence Committee report as bolstering their biases,” Fleitz contends the committee did not follow proper procedures in their investigation and based their conclusions on too few intelligence sources — and too much on the potentially tainted observations of the CIA.

“The Senate Intelligence Committee report falsely claims that ‘all analytical lines are supported with all-source intelligence’ and that analysts who wrote the intelligence community assessment consistently said they ‘were under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions.’”

Fleitz says House Intelligence Committee staff members discovered exactly the opposite and told him that there is ample evidence that Russia may have interfered in the 2016 election, but not necessarily on behalf of Trump.

“More gravely, they said that [then-] CIA Director John Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts.”

The former NSC chief of staff further stated that “Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.”

Fleitz suggested that Brennan relied upon “low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win … ”

Many people already suspected this… and more concerning Brennan’s involvement in spygate.