Peek Physically Ousted

PUBLISHED: 2:28 PM 20 Jan 2020
UPDATED: 11:05 PM 20 Jan 2020

National Security Aide Removed From WH: Now Some Things Makes Sense

This is huge, and this man’s well-known history indicates to some that he was purposely placed in the White House to become another deep state mole.

Given the recent revival of Russian claims, there seems to be no question why Peel was placed as a Russian 'Advisor' inside the White House. (Source: Al Monitor YouTube Screenshot)

Andrew Peek, who came to the White House a scant few weeks ago to serve as head of European and Russian affairs at the National Security Council was physically removed from the premises on Friday in an explosive incident.

Peek was sent in from the Department of State, and his history indicates to a number of experts that he was slated for the role in order to act as a deep state spy against President Trump.

Whether this occurred with a nod and wink from Mike Pompeo is speculation at this point, but there’s absolutely no doubt about Peek’s previous activity and that he was slated as a “Russian advisor” at a time when Lawfare and other deep state controllers plan to weave a new Russian conspiracy smear against the president.

The New York Post outlined the facts of the incident:

Peek, who took the position in November, was placed on administrative leave pending the security investigation, Axios reported.

He is the third person in that position to leave in the past year.

His predecessors, Tim Morrison and Fiona Hill, testified last fall during the House’s impeachment inquiry into President Trump’s dealings in Ukraine.

Peek came to the White House from the State Department, where he focused on Iran and Iraq.

The White House and the National Security Council declined to comment on personnel matters.

However, Conservative Treehouse explained what really happened:

There are few details about why Peek was physically removed and is under a very serious investigation; however, some of Andrew Peek’s professional background details tell a story.

The connection to Gen. John Allen is a MASSIVE warning flare.

Andrew Peek, the senior director for European and Russian affairs at the National Security Council, has been placed on administrative leave pending a security-related investigation, people familiar with the situation tell Axios.

First the Daily Mail:

[…] Peek had been in the NSC role for just two months, after most recently working as a deputy assistant secretary of state with responsibility for Iran and Iraq.

[…] Peek had been expected to attend the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland next week with Trump and other top aides. However, he is currently on leave pending a security-related investigation, people familiar with the situation told Axios.

[…] Peek served as a U.S. Army intelligence officer who worked under General John Allen in Afghanistan.

[…] Prior to joining the Trump administration, Peek served as a U.S. Army intelligence officer who worked under General John Allen in Afghanistan.

[…] He was also a national security adviser to Senator Gordon Smith, an Oregon Republican, and Senator Mike Johanns, a Nebraska Republican.  (link)

From a Bloomberg article:

[…] Peek previously served as a deputy assistant secretary of State for Iraq and Iran, and he was seen as an ally of Robert O’Brien.

Andrew Peek came from the State Department. Because the appointment happened in the past two months, it would appear Andrew Peek was recommended by the Dept. of State and accepted for the NSC post by National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien.

Here’s how it looks:  Andrew Peek was a mole.

A resistance spy sent into the Trump administration as part of the allied deep state resistance effort.  Someone caught him attempting to access something, and here’s how CTH can tell.

The biggest flare that identifies Andrew Peek’s ideology is the connection to former U.S. General John Allen.

CTH has tracked Allen for several years; he was used as part of Hillary Clinton’s campaign.  He spoke at the DNC convention for Hillary Clinton.

John Allen was also used, politically, as part of President Obama’s 2014 false narrative around ISIS; giving the illusion of an effort to confront the radical Islamists.

Obama had been holding leverage over John Allen since 2012 [HERE]

Allen, a four-star Marine general, succeeded Petraeus as the top American commander in Afghanistan in July 2011; but General John Allen had a serious zipper problem.  Allen retired in 2012 when his sexual proclivities surfaced.

However, Obama brought him back when he needed a General he could control in 2014.

Allen’s 2012 zipper problem became Obama’s 2014 political leverage to use General Allen as a tool to present the image of Obama’s faux fight against ISIS.

Andrew Peek coming from the stable of John Allen tells us everything we need to know about the ideology of Mr. Peek.  There’s no doubt in my mind that Andrew Peek is therefore an ideological member of the resistance similar to another NSC appointment, Alexander Vindman.

Keep in mind, National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien also comes from inside the Dept of State.

So whether Mike Pompeo and Robert O’Brien set-up Peek as a mole, or whether Peek’s activities were discovered without their foreknowledge is an open question.  However, I find it impossible to believe that NSA Robert O’Brien didn’t know the ideology of Peek prior to the appointment.

Additionally, in the periphery of downstream consequence, and seemingly out of nowhere today, impeachment Lead Manager and HPSCI Chairman Adam Schiff said:

“The Intelligence Community is beginning to withhold documents from Congress on the issue of Ukraine. They appear to be succumbing to pressure from the administration. The NSA in particular is withholding what are potentially relevant documents to our oversight.”

Schiff: “The Intelligence Community is beginning to withhold documents from Congress on the issue of Ukraine. They appear to be succumbing to pressure from the administration. The NSA in particular is withholding what are potentially relevant documents to our oversight.” Via ABC pic.twitter.com/FUQSS2wcpj

— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) January 19, 2020

Considering the timeline; and considering the topic(s); and considering the ideology; there’s a strong possibility the person on the other end of Peeks’ communication effort was someone in the network of Adam Schiff, perhaps Mary McCord or similar…