One of the names that always comes up when talking about respecting liberty and the Constitution is “America’s Judge,” Judge Andrew Napolitano. He has a reputation for being both a kind and fair man, as well as being all but a household name due to his Fox News show(s). While some, like Judge Judy, are known more as entertainers than judges, Napolitano has managed to reach his status without becoming a cartoon character. Not to mention that many media outlets have reported there has been mention of him being nominated for the Supreme Court, where he is said to have met Trump on the matter.
While he did not get the job, he did advise Trump on his nominee for the Supreme Court, and his name is not erased from the board for future vacancies. With all this to lose, does it seem likely he would make something up without proof? Of course not, it just means that the country should listen to what he has to say.
He stated “three intelligence sources” claim that Obama used the U.K. spying agency, GCHQ, against Trump. Obama was said by all three that he wanted to acquire “transcripts of conversations involving President Donald Trump on ‘Fox & Friends’ on Tuesday,” as reported by Breitbart News.
His full statement (pasted below) declares that these three sources told Fox News that Obama went “outside the chain of command” with his actions. Napolitano claims that the former president did not use the C.I.A, the F.B.I, the Justice Department, or even the N.S.A. This means that there is not going to be an easy paper trail leading back to Obama. From the Judge, we learn that GCHQ is the British spying agency, and that “they have 24/7 access to the NSA database.”
He closes by pointing out, “So by simply having two people go to them saying, ‘President Obama needs transcripts of conversations involving candidate Trump, conversations involving president-elect Trump,’ he’s able to get it, and there’s no American fingerprints on this.” If true, then this is Obama not only tampering heavily with existing law and legal precedence, but also displaying zero respect for the American process. He cares nothing for the will of the voters either, only for victorious outcomes to anti-U.S. interests and agendas.
It is quite apparent that those driven by Trump hatred are seeking any and every reason to mock the president’s “midnight tweets.” However, it seems that he’s been proven correct yet again. Even honest Democrats will admit to having read about the great number of people who have been murdered around the Clintons. Therefore, if 13 people (at least) just happened to be murdered around the Clintons at the most convenient of times, then is it hard to imagine that a foreign spy agency would be used? Someone who is allegedly willing to see political enemies murdered would certainly allow such a thing to happen with no qualms whatsoever.
It is disturbing to think that many of the leaks that Trump has been battling may not even be coming from his own camp entirely, as first assumed. If the White House is bugged and wiretapped, then Lord only knows who is gathering what information. We know that Clinton has been proven to have had Russian connections, as she tried to suggest that Trump did, a common tactic for her. The media has not reported on this at all, so why would they take the time to ask the hard questions?
No, not just the questions of morality and respect for a fair campaign, because none of us thought that Clinton cared about any of those bothersome things to begin with. The really deep points are when one asks what kinds of listening devices could be in the White House that Trump’s sniffers have not found? We know that the White House IT Department was asleep at the wheel regarding Trump’s tablet in Florida, so could they have missed anything else?
Also, let us ask if it is possible to hack a bugging device. If so, then is it possible that not only those intended to hear the wiretaps secrets are hearing it (which is bad enough), but also anyone who hacked it. For that matter, we can even fairly ask just how many were “intended” to hear it. That means if Trump is bugged, who is listening? Who planted they bugs or taps? How many people?
Lastly, though other questions may branch, we have to ask if other Republicans could be hearing any of this. Politics makes strange bedfellows it is said, and with so many Republicans choosing to vote Clinton or third party last cycle, it could be that any number of deals were made. We have reason to believe from a man about as accurate as Judge Napolitano, Julian Assange, said that the Intelligence Community and Clinton are looking at a “President Pence.” How this would happen or why has not yet been addressed, which is more than mildly frightening.
There is also the argument that this is the kind of fake drivel that one would expect from CNN, but if stated, then we must return to the question of motive. The Judge has worked his whole life to gain the trust of the American people. He works in a field of a million judges and lawyers, and has worked his way to Fox News. A man who has achieved all of this, and is on the cusp of being appointed to every judges dream position simply does NOT make irresponsible statements on this level.
So if Napolitano is not lying, then there are three people out there with some serious bombshell information. This is the kind of news that makes democracy reel on its heels. America went to the polls and elected President Donald Trump because they wanted something vastly different from what Obama and his legion of socialists desired for our nation. For this, he has been cheated, lied and spied upon. America has been given the facts by one of the most reliable legal minds alive today. What we do with this knowledge is up to us.
The Judges full comments;
“Three intelligence sources have informed Fox News that President Obama went outside the chain of command. He didn’t use the NSA. He didn’t use the CIA. He didn’t use the FBI, and he didn’t use Department of Justice. He used GCHQ. What the heck is GCHQ? That’s the initials for the British spying agency. They have 24/7 access to the NSA database. So by simply having two people go to them saying, ‘President Obama needs transcripts of conversations involving candidate Trump, conversations involving president-elect Trump,’ he’s able to get it, and there’s no American fingerprints on this.”