Mueller In Contempt?

PUBLISHED: 1:00 PM 17 Dec 2018
UPDATED: 5:51 PM 17 Dec 2018

Mueller In Hot Seat For Obstructing Justice, Destroying Evidence

Although a judge has ordered Mueller turn over evidence in the Flynn set up, the Special Counsel is ignoring it, and by doing so, is violating the law, according to experts.

Robert Mueller may have violated the law by destroying evidence in the charges against Michael Flynn.

According to one expert, Robert Mueller has broken the law concerning the prosecution of Michael Flynn.

A contributor for the Daily Caller wrote:

“The Supreme Court held long ago in Brady v. Maryland that the Constitution requires the prosecution, which holds all the cards in a criminal case, to give the defense all evidence favorable to the defendant, whether it impeaches a witness, mitigates punishment or shows his innocence.

“Indeed, the burden is on prosecutors to find anything in the possession of the government that is favorable to the defense.

“From the minute Judge Emmet G. Sullivan received the case against Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, which will be decided on Tuesday, he ordered Mueller to provide the defense with all Brady material.

“Last week, Judge Sullivan specifically ordered Mueller to produce any FBI interview reports — called 302s — or memoranda relevant to the original interview of Gen. Flynn. Ironically, Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley has been requesting the agents’ notes and 302s for two years. Did Mueller comply?

“Mueller has thumbed his nose at Judge Sullivan’s order.

“He produced only a 302 created by his own squad seven months later from his own agent’s interview of none other than the infamous, fired-for-bias, disgraced, Trump-loathing, former Agent Peter Strzok — the guy who swore he’d ‘stop’ President Trump and devised ‘an insurance policy’ with his mistress Lisa Page and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe in case Trump won the election.

“We are watching Mueller execute that insurance policy by the day.

“The evidence indicates Mueller has destroyed or is suppressing Brady material.”

According to FBI Protocol, the original 302, created by Special Agent Joe Pientka, has the hand-written, not doctored, notes concerning the “Jan. 24, 2016 ambush interview of General Flynn” Strzok and Pientka. And, Comey read the original 302 before he was fired.

However, that 302 appears to be missing.

“Where are the original 302, his notes, and where is Agent Pientka? Grassley has been trying to get access to all three for almost two years.”

“Mueller’s filing confirms that Agent Pientka was assigned to take notes of the interview. Judge Sullivan’s order encompasses the production of those notes. Where are they? Were they destroyed despite Grassley’s longstanding request and Judge Sullivan’s original Brady order?”

“The failure to produce them is another Brady violation that warrants the dismissal of the charges against Flynn and warrants holding Mueller and his team in contempt of court.”

Likewise, “Because Comey just confessed on national TV that he oh-so-cleverly, gleefully, and deliberately breached all protocols and any semblance of ethics to ensnare the new administration and Flynn in their carefully calculated perjury trap, there is every reason to declassify Comey’s testimony immediately. The public is entitled to see his duplicity.”

John Solomon reported, and Grassley has identified, information in the possession of the DIA that is exculpatory of Flynn. Apparently, the information remains classified — most likely to protect Comey from outrageous abuses of allowing private contractors to mine our intelligence gathering systems as far back as 2012 for nefarious reasons including unmasking and private profit — but that does not absolve Mueller of his obligation to produce it to the defense.”

In addition to this, “The Inspector General of the Department of Justice reported late last week that Mueller wiped Peter Strzok’s cell phone of all messages during the crucial time he was working for special counsel. The IG was unable to recover any text messages from it.”

“This was after the inspector general informed Mueller of the extreme bias of Strzok and Page evidenced by thousands of text messages on their phones.

“These messages were so egregious they required their termination from Mueller’s squad.

“Not only did Mueller hide this development from Congress, but he destroyed evidence on Strzok’s phone and allowed DOJ to do the same for Page’s phone. That’s a crime. Mueller put Paul Manafort in solitary confinement for simply trying to contact a witness.”

“Any ethical law Department of Justice official would have taken custody of all electronic devices of Strzok and Page immediately upon discovery of their extreme bias and blatant misconduct — or certainly upon their termination — and preserved all the evidence.”

“For Mueller to destroy this evidence is blatant obstruction of justice that warrants his immediate termination. The same is true for Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein.”

“The evidence strongly suggests Mueller violated Brady, destroyed or suppressed evidence, and obstructed justice in violation of 18 USC §1512(c). He has disgraced himself and the Department of Justice.”

Many people hope Judge Sullivan will start the process of bringing these traitors to justice.