Civil Asset ‘Theft’

PUBLISHED: 6:29 PM 2 Jan 2020
UPDATED: 6:30 PM 2 Jan 2020

Missouri County Police Seize $2.6 Million From People Never Charged In ‘Civil Asset Forfeiture’

The civil asset forfeiture laws are basically a way to steal from citizens without due process, a practice that a number of people have fought against for years.

Why is this practice allowed to continue? (Source: CBS YouTube Screenshot)

People around the country are fighting against the unconstitutional practice of “civil asset forfeiture.” The process allows law enforcement to seize money and assets deemed connected to drug-related crimes.

However, the practice has become a method for local government to enrich their coffers without due process. And in some situations, the abuse is incredible.

In St. Charles County, Missouri, police seized $2.6 million in assets in a single year, according to a national investigation of the practice, organized by the Pulitzer Center.

St. Louis Public Radio reported that at least 39 unsuspecting drivers were coerced into signing over their rights and their property in 2018.

Reason reported:

According to the report, officers would lie in wait for a car committing a minor traffic violation. Upon seeing the minor violation, officers would then pull the car over, question the motorist, and then direct them to a private towing lot owned by Superior Towing. While in the lot, officers would ask more questions and search the vehicle, all in the hopes of finding large amounts of cash or connections to drugs.

If a trained police dog smelled marijuana on the cash, officers then gave the motorists two options: they could go to jail, or sign their possessions away to the department and leave with a traffic ticket.

[Since almost all cash in circulation is contaminated in this way, the seizures were easy pickin’s.]

In the 39 documented stops, no criminal charges were filed. A third of the targets were stopped and taken to the lot after midnight. Additionally, nearly half of the drivers had either Hispanic or Asian surnames.

The Institute for Justice gives Missouri a B+ for its civil asset forfeiture laws. Technically, state law requires criminal conviction or a guilty plea before forfeiture, and the assets are supposed to go towards schools, not law enforcement.

So how did St. Charles cops get away with their shady stops?

According to the report, the answer lies in the federal Equitable Sharing program. The Department of Justice provides a guide to the program, which allows for the “potential to share federal forfeiture proceeds with cooperating state and local law enforcement agencies.” By turning over their convictionless assets to the federal government, St. Charles law enforcement can split the funds 80-20.

A legislative effort to close this loophole and force law enforcement to comply with state law was defeated this year after the local police lobby quietly campaigned against it, calling it “anti-police.”

The reform effort was led by Rep. Shamed Dogan (Baldwin), a libertarian Republican who has been trying to reform convictionless civil asset forfeiture practices in the state for several years.