Racism Definition ‘Updated’

PUBLISHED: 7:57 PM 10 Jun 2020
UPDATED: 8:24 PM 10 Jun 2020

Merriam Webster’s Alters Definition of “Racism” After Complaint

Changing the definitions of words is not only scary… it’s deliberate.

Crazy. (Source: KCCI YouTube Screenshot)

Very scary times.

Remarkably, this is not satire.

Merriam Webster’s dictionary is changing the definition of racism after a woman complained about it. (Not a joke) https://t.co/Lxyzj3Mi2n

— Mark Dice (@MarkDice) June 10, 2020

KMOV 4 reported:

The dictionary defines racism as “a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race.”

[…] “I basically told them they need to include that there is systematic oppression on people. It’s not just ‘I don’t like someone,’ it’s a system of oppression for a certain group of people,” [recent college grad Kennedy Mitchum] explained.

And after a few back and forth emails, the editor of Merriam Webster Dictionary agreed and wrote back, “While our focus will always be on faithfully reflecting the real-world usage of a word, not on promoting any particular viewpoint, we have concluded that omitting any mention of the systemic aspects of racism promotes a certain viewpoint in itself.”

Alex Chambers, the editor of Merriam Webster Dictionary said a revision to the entry for “racism” is now being drafted.

“This revision would not have been made without your persistence in contacting us about this problem. We sincerely thank you for repeatedly writing in and apologize for the harm and offense we have caused in failing to address the issue sooner. I will see to it that the entry for racism is given the attention it sorely needs,” wrote Chambers.

Information Liberation reported:

The term racism is said to have originated with communist Leon Trotsky in 1933, but it was only popularized rather recently by Trotsky’s bedfellows in the US media.

Here’s a Webster’s dictionary purportedly from 1955 showing the term “racism” didn’t even exist:

The New York Times’ Chronicle, which mapped out what percentage of Times articles included specific words over the years, showed they didn’t start pushing the term until around the mid 1960’s:

As the Times’ Chronicle feature produced embarrassing results such as those above, the viewer was disabled shortly after it was released but newer independent software has shown similar results:

“Racism” is an interesting word in that it has no set definition. What was considered perfectly normal a few years ago is now considered “racist.”

https://t.co/WCGzmlpCKn pic.twitter.com/2JQlQkKMkV

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) June 9, 2020

The definition of what is “racist” is constantly expanding. The latest iteration of “racism” is “white silence” — which is described as “violence.”

Old pic, but relevant:

>it’s time for you to shut up and allow unheard voices a chance to speak
>silence is violence pic.twitter.com/OaI3uCIDAP

— Orwell & Goode (@OrwellNGoode) June 9, 2020

Meanwhile, New York Times writer Nikole Hannah-Jones (who was just given a Pulitzer Prize) said recently that the violent destruction of property by rioters “is not violence” because the property “can be replaced.”

Tucker blasts the press for assisting the riots. Watch Nikole Hannah Jones – violence is not violence if you destroying property. What about her property? Where do all those liberal lunatics come from…? pic.twitter.com/85OsVGLJls

— Martin Golobič (@martin_golobic) June 3, 2020

Incidentally, the Bible explains how very powerful “words” are in a number of places. Therefore, is it any wonder that the forces that seek to destroy are waging a war on words?