Dem Faces Recall

PUBLISHED: 1:45 PM 13 Jul 2020
UPDATED: 6:16 PM 13 Jul 2020

Judge Approves Petition As “Fire The Mayor” Campaign Gains Speed

Jenny Durkan allowed Seattle to become a cesspool of violence and destruction, and many people in Seattle want her out of office.

She's fighting it, of course. (Source: PBS News Hour YouTube Screenshot)

A petition to recall Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan is gaining speed, and now a judge has approved it. The campaign, “Fire The Mayor” has wide support given that Durkan’s actions over the past weeks have been calculated to increase violence, destruction of public and private property, and generally violated her oath to uphold the laws of the state and the city.

The Seattle Times ‘reported’:

The ruling Friday on charges filed by a group of five people last month comes after weeks of local protests [aka riots, looting, murder] against racism and police brutality…

Once any recall petition is approved, signatures are needed to qualify for a special election ballot. The petitioners must, within 180 days, collect valid signatures from a number of voters equal to 25% of the votes cast in the last election. In this case, signatures from more than 50,000 Seattle voters would be needed.

The Durkan petitioners’ recall effort, known online as the “Fire the Mayor” campaign, accuses the mayor of “endanger[ing] the peace and safety of the community” by allowing police to “leak false information about fabricated crimes and threats to the media” and issuing a citywide curfew without sufficient notice to the public. The petitioners also accused Durkan of restricting certain property rights in downtown Seattle and Capitol Hill, the neighborhood where many of the protests took place.

“Jenny Durkan’s abuses of power, lack of foresight and failure to protect the public — and the peace — in Seattle leaves us with no choice,” petitioner Elliott Harvey wrote in a statement on the campaign’s website. “This is exactly the kind of case a recall is intended to address.”

In a response Saturday, Durkan’s chief of staff, Stephanie Formas, said the mayor “consistently has acted to protect the City’s public health and safety and to respect the constitutional rights to peaceful protesters,” and defended Police Chief Carmen Best, who Durkan believes “has exercised her challenging duties lawfully and appropriately to protect the public peace,” according to the statement.

[Except, of course, for the people who were viciously beaten and murdered while she allowed the occupation to proceed without hindrance…. And even helped it.]

The court this month held an online hearing on the petition, hearing from the petitioners and from attorney Rebecca J. Roe, who represented Durkan.

In her ruling Friday, Judge Mary E. Roberts dismissed six of the seven charges put forward as “insufficient,” but allowed one — which accuses Durkan of allowing tear gas and other crowd control weapons to be used during the coronavirus pandemic — to proceed “more narrowly than alleged.”

The judge did not rule on whether the allegation was true. “This court’s role in this case is limited,” she wrote. “At this stage of a recall effort, the court is to assume that the Recall Petitioners’ allegations are true, and to determine whether if true, they can support a recall.”

Formas, speaking for Durkan, said in a statement that the court’s ruling is significant since, at this stage of the proceedings, the judge must assume the allegations are true. “Even under this low standard, the Court dismissed six of the seven claims” in the petition, and dismissed a second petition altogether, the statement said.

“The mayor believes this remaining claim will be dismissed,” Formas said.

The mayor could appeal the ruling, but Formas did not say if she would.

Roberts also approved a ballot synopsis, which reads: “As alleged by [the petitioners], shall Jenny Durkan be recalled from office for misfeasance, malfeasance, and violation of the oath of office, based on the following charge: Mayor Durkan endangered the peace and safety of the community and violated her duties under state and local laws and her oath to uphold the federal and state constitutions when she failed to institute new policies and safety measures for the Seattle Police Department after learning of the use of chemical agents on peaceful protesters as a means of crowd control during a public health emergency.”

A court clerk is now expected to certify and submit the synopsis to Durkan, each petitioner and the county auditor, according to the ruling.

The next step is for the petitioners to gather signatures. If enough are gathered and they are verified as belonging to legal voters, a judge will set a special election to be held between 45 and 90 days after the signatures are certified. The law urges that the special election be held on a scheduled election or special election day when possible, and prohibits it from being held between a primary and general election.

In recent weeks, Seattle City Councilmembers Kshama Sawant, Teresa Mosqueda and Tammy Morales have asked Durkan to resign or consider resigning, specifically voicing a push to carve into the Police Department’s budget.

Formas on Saturday reiterated that “Mayor Durkan won’t be distracted by Councilmember Sawant’s impeachment efforts.”

The city of Seattle is also facing a class-action lawsuit filed last month by a group of Capitol Hill residents and businesses for the “extensive harm” they’ve faced as a result of CHOP, or the Capitol Hill Organized Protest.