Dems To Control Fox?

PUBLISHED: 1:10 PM 3 Apr 2019
UPDATED: 5:10 PM 3 Apr 2019

House Dems Demand ‘Oversight’ Of Fox News Editorial Judgments

Yes, democrats in the House have demanded to know why Fox News decided not to run a salacious accusation about Donald Trump, but refused to acknowledge that other media outlets also made the same decision.

Elijah Cummings is the voice of 'reason' behind this latest attempt to destroy the republic and create a slave state.

House democrats have finally lost it.

They are claiming that Fox News ‘interfered’ in a presidential election by not running an accusation of an extramarital affair Donald Trump supposedly had before his candidacy.

Democrats demands to know why Fox News didn’t publish the story and basically want the power to review all editorial decision made by a free press outlet.

Breitbart reported:

House Committee on Oversight and Reform chair Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) wrote to former Fox News reporter Diana Falzone last month demanding that she turn over any documents relating to Trump’s alleged extramarital affairs.

An article in the New Yorker last month alleged that Fox News executive Ken LaCorte spiked the story to protect Trump — a claim LaCorte has vehemently denied, saying the story lacked corroborating evidence and that the network was merely practicing responsible journalism, as were other outlets who declined the story.

That article seems to have motivated Cummings’s letter — a letter that not only seeks personal dirt on the president, but seeks information that might be used to review Fox News’ editorial decisions.

The committee’s letter suggests that Fox News may have violated campaign finance rules if it tried to help Trump by suppressing the Daniels story.

Falzone has said she will cooperate with the committee, despite an agreement with Fox that prevents her from speaking about the story.

In an op-ed at Mediaite, LaCorte says he supports Falzone’s desire to talk about the story publicly, but that he will refuse to cooperate with the committee’s effort to exercise oversight over the free press.

LaCorte writes:

Falzone’s lawyer announced that she would comply with the committee. I won’t.

If House Oversight can launch an investigation based on the ridiculous notion that publishing, or even more bizarrely not publishing, a story can be construed as an in-kind campaign contribution, then no journalist in America is safe from government intimidation. It’s a vast overreach of power, and I won’t have any part of it.

To be clear, I fully support Fox News lifting Falzone’s non-disclosure agreement so that she can make her case publicly, without leaks or lawyers. But neither editorial decisions nor joke writing should be a subject of government approval.

Mr. LaCorte is absolutely correct. No government body should have the power to control what is written in the free press, and any laws that seek to silence—even so-called ‘hate speech’—defy the intention and basis of the First Amendment.

The fact that democrats think they can do this is a prime example of not only the gross ignorance of the American people concerning the Republic, but also democrats’ belief that their voters are too stupid or too blinded by hate of the president to see what’s happening.

In either case, it is a shameful state of affairs.