Wednesday evening, NBC news conducted a “Commander in Chief Forum” hosted by Matt Lauer, and it allowed both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump (at different times) to take questions in front of a boisterous military only crowd. The forum itself wasn’t nearly as entertaining and substantive as many would have imagined, but we discovered something almost unimaginable early on in the segment.
During the forum, Hillary Clinton spoke first. While speaking, she took a moment to brush her hair off of her ear a little, and in doing so she revealed that something was inside of her ear. So millions are demanding an answer to the question: Was Hillary Clinton wearing an earpiece during last night’s presidential forum? This isn’t a conspiracy theory either, because the photo evidence is particularly strong in this case and clearly shows that Hillary was hiding something in her ear. Take a look for yourself:
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) September 8, 2016
Conservative actor James Woods was one of the most notable names to notice the earpiece and he immediately began to draw attention to the issue with the simple question, “Earpiece?” and a close up image of Hillary from last night’s forum. That’s the latest question swirling around the Internet after pictures appeared to show Hillary with some kind of flesh-colored device embedded inside her ear.
Now, if you are arguing that this is some wild theory that is baseless and unfounded, you may have a very small argument given that we cannot confirm exactly what it is, but we do know that this is not the first time Hillary has worn an earpiece. In a WikiLeaks email release, Assange shows us that Huma Abedin, Hillary’s long-time top aide, asked Hillary, “Did u take your earpiece or do I need to get it?”
“She literally can’t help herself. She’s the kind of sociopath who will lie even if the truth were more beneficial,” added Woods, linking to an article by TruePundit which reported that Hillary was wearing an earpiece to receive “stealth coaching” during the NBC live town hall event.
“NYPD sources involved with the NBC forum’s security detail confirm Clinton was wearing an inductive earpiece, the same technology employed by almost all lead Broadway actors to receive forgotten lines and stealth off-stage cues from directors. The flesh-colored earbud is easily concealed. There are no wires running directly to the ear like you see with the units employed by Secret Service protection detail personnel,” claimed the article.
The report goes on to provide technical details about the earpiece, asserting that it is “almost invisible to anyone” and is “normally issued to law enforcement or corporate security teams.”
This is not the first time Clinton has faced charges that she was wearing an earpiece during a crucial event – similar claims were made after her appearance in front of the House Select Benghazi Hearing in October last year.
Of course, the earpiece could have just been a hearing aid, although there doesn’t appear to be any admission or record of Hillary wearing one in the past. Others claim it’s merely a reflection of studio lights. You be the judge, but do not forget WHO exactly we are talking about here.
— Thomas Paine (@Thomas1774Paine) September 8, 2016
Nevertheless, let’s explore two avenues here, both of which are not good for Hillary Clinton.
A) Hillary was wearing an hearing aid. Well, that would just bolster everyone’s argument that she is physically ill and unfit to serve this country. It would add another illness to the long list of symptoms she suffers from, such as: Parkinson’s disease, mental fatigue, badly damaged and unsteady knees, and now she quite possibly has a hearing impairment. So if this is a hearing aid, then she cannot confirm that because it will admit she has another illness.
B) Hillary was wearing an earpiece to communicate with someone. We have already confirmed that Hillary worked with Sen. Menendez before her Benghazi hearing in 2012 to get easy questions so she could “clear up some concerns,” so maybe someone was giving her better talking points to the questions. Either way, how hard is it to answer a military veteran when they ask you a point blank question? Can she not even do that without getting help from others?
Either way, we are presented with another reason for not electing Hillary Clinton to be our next Commander-in-Chief. If you haven’t already been presented with enough reasons to vote Trump, then there could be a problem. Hillary Clinton is a lot of things, and it should go without having to repeat them. She will fundamentally destroy this country if we do not put an end to her this election. We must rise up and defeat her for good.
When you wake up November 9th, the day after the election, which candidate do you want to see plastered across your television and news feed? The choice is yours.