Mueller Records Re-Searched

PUBLISHED: 1:20 PM 19 Mar 2019
UPDATED: 5:22 PM 19 Mar 2019

Federal Judge Rules FBI Search ‘Inadequate,’ Orders Broader Search Of All Records

Judicial Watch was victorious in federal court, after the judge realized that the FBI had only performed a specialize search of all the Mueller/Strzok records requested, deliberately covering up others.

Democrat fixer, liar and adulterer Peter Strzok's communications with Robert Mueller have to be re-examined and turned over, according to the latest ruling by a federal court judge.

Independent government watchdog group Judicial Watch was handed another federal court victory on Friday.

United States District Court Judge Christopher R. Cooper for the District of Columbia agreed that the Federal Bureau of Investigation was slipshod in its compliance with previous requests for all Mueller records pertaining to Peter Strzok, the disgraced adulterous agent who was a key player in both setting up President Trump and protecting Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential election.

Judicial Watch reported the judge agreed “the FBI did not adequately search for records related to the removal and reassignment of Peter Strzok, a former deputy to the assistant director for counterintelligence at the FBI, from special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigative team.”

In granting Judicial Watch’s request, Judge Cooper ordered the FBI to further search their records. (The original, deficient search had only returned 14 pages.)

The order comes in a December 2017 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch after the DOJ failed to respond to and August 17, 2017, request (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Federal Bureau of Investigation (No. 1:17-cv-02682)).

Judicial Watch seeks:

  • All records regarding the assignment of FBI Supervisor Peter Strzok to the special counsel’s investigation led by former Director Robert Mueller.
  • All records related to the reassignment of FBI Supervisor Peter Strzok from the special counsel’s investigation to another position within the FBI.
  • All SF-50 and/or SF-52 employment forms, as well as all related records of communication between any official, employee, or representative of the FBI and any other individual or entity.

In his decision, Judge Cooper called the FBI’s search “overly cramped:”

Notwithstanding that Judicial Watch’s request referred to Mueller by name … the Bureau searched only for the term “special counsel.”

But surely one would expect that Agent Strzok and other FBI personnel might use the Special Counsel’s name — “Mueller” — rather than his title when discussing Strzok’s assignment to the Russia investigation, especially in informal emails.

Another logical variation on “special counsel” is its commonly used acronym “SCO,” which appears to be used within the Special Counsel’s Office itself, as reflected by documents that the FBI uncovered and produced to Judicial Watch.

The ruling also stated that the FBI did not adequately respond to Judicial Watch’s FOIA lawsuit because it limited its search to only Strzok’s email account.

Judge Cooper ordered that the FBI must conduct a new search that includes “the email accounts of any of Agent Strzok’s superiors or other Bureau officials who were involved in the decision to assign him to the Special Counsel’s Office or the decision to reassign him to the FBI’s Human Resources Division after his removal from the Mueller investigation.”

The FBI must also expand its search to other forms of communication in addition to email. Given Strzok’s well-known use of text messaging, “it strikes the Court as reasonably likely that he discussed his assignment to the Special Counsel’s Office in text messages—which again is the standard for assessing an agency’s selection of search locations.”

Disgraced agent Strzok was a key mastermind behind the Russian collusion hoax and other set-ups.

Strzok was reportedly removed from the Mueller investigative team in August 2017 and reassigned to a human resources position after it was discovered that he and then-FBI lawyer Lisa Page exchanged text messages during the Clinton investigation and 2016 election season that raised serious questions about his anti-Trump/pro-Clinton bias.

They were also engaged in an extramarital affair. Strzok infamously texted “there’s no way he gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk.”

Strzok reportedly oversaw the FBI’s interviews of former National Security Adviser, General Michael Flynn; (which Americans now know was a deliberate set-up, under the guise of standard communications)

He changed former FBI Director James Comey’s language about Hillary Clinton’s actions regarding her illicit email server from “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless;” (this altered the severity of the crime, allowing Clinton to get off for her borderline treasonous actions)

He played a lead role in the FBI’s interview of Clinton and is suspected of being responsible for using the unverified dossier to obtain a FISA warrant in order to spy on President Trump’s campaign.

“The court rightly slammed the FBI for its gamesmanship in searching for records about one of the most notorious FBI agents of all time – Peter Strzok,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

“The FBI leadership is in cover-up mode on its abuses targeting President Trump and we’re pleased a federal court pushed back on this stonewall,” he added.

On July 31, 2018, Judicial Watch released the first 14 pages of FBI documents produced in this FOIA lawsuit, showing that Strzok insisted on retaining his FBI security clearance before moving to the Mueller team and confirmed that Strzok played a pivotal role in the flawed Hillary Clinton email investigation.

Peter Strzok was the go-to guy for every sickening abuse of power orchestrated by the Obama administration.

He claimed in testimony that the DOJ had prevented the FBI from examining Clinton Foundation evidence of pay-to-play deals, and otherwise blamed others for whatever shady-disgusting-underhanded schemes he was helping plot and carry out.

Getting the information required by the Judicial Watch lawsuit could have serious implications for him and finally deliver what Americans have been clamoring for… for over a year: an indictment.