Couple Faces Action?

PUBLISHED: 5:12 PM 30 Jun 2020

Dem Couple Who Defended Their Lives Now Threatened By Soros Funded Circuit Attorney

This couple are registered democrats but the fact that they had the gall to defend their lives from a rampaging mob who broke down their gate and threatened to kill them has caused a St. Louis, Soros funded attorney to investigate them.

The 'peaceful' protestors violently tore down the gate and then threatened the family... one with a "shotgun" mic which could easily be mistaken as a real gun. (Source: Bloomberg Quick Take YouTube Screenshot)

The democrat couple who defended their lives and their property from a rampaging mob of ‘protestors’ are being “investigated” by a Soros funded St. Louis attorney, despite the fact that the lawless gang is being investigated by the police.

The actions videoed on Sunday have caused a leftist uproar, and the fact that this couple had every right under Missouri law for their actions makes Kim Gardner’s ‘investigation’ all the more concerning, many people argue.

Conservative Treehouse reported:

The husband and wife who defended themselves and protected their property from looters/protestors are now being threatened by a Soros funded STL Circuit Attorney.

Ms. Kimberly M Gardner is an activist within the legal profession who has an expressed purpose to destroy property rights, advance the cause of a socialist society, and collapse the legal system that allows citizens to protect themselves from the rampaging mob.

  1. Louis Dispatch […] The McCloskeys had been at home and heard a loud commotion coming from the street; they went to investigate and saw “a large group of subjects forcefully break an iron gate marked with ‘No Trespassing’ and ‘Private Street’ signs,” police said.

“The group began yelling obscenities and threats of harm to both victims,” police said. “When the victims observed multiple subjects who were armed, they then armed themselves and contacted police.”

Police are continuing [to] investigate the incident on Portland Place, but are labeling it as a case of trespassing and fourth-degree assault by intimidation.

Meanwhile, were the couple, as they stood on their own property, within their rights to point weapons at protesters? Gun rights advocates say yes. A police spokesperson said to ask “the courts.”

Anders Walker, a constitutional law professor at St. Louis University, said that although it’s “very dangerous” to engage protesters with guns, the homeowners broke no laws by brandishing or pointing weapons at them because Portland Place is a private street. He said the McCloskeys are protected by Missouri’s Castle Doctrine, which allows people to use deadly force to defend private property.

“At any point that you enter the property, they can then, in Missouri, use deadly force to get you off the lawn,” Walker said, calling the state’s Castle Doctrine a “force field” that “indemnifies you, and you can even pull the trigger in Missouri.”

Luckily, Walker said, no one got shot.

“There’s no right to protest on those streets,” Walker said. “The protesters thought they had a right to protest, but as a technical matter, they were not allowed to be there. … It’s essentially a private estate. If anyone was violating the law, it was the protesters. In fact, if (the McCloskeys) have photos of the protesters, they could go after them for trespassing.”

St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kimberly M. Gardner appeared to take a different view, releasing a statement Monday that said she’s “alarmed at the events that occurred over the weekend where peaceful protestors (sic) were met by guns and a violent assault.”

Gardner said her office is investigating. (read more)

So, instead of adhering to the law, Gardner is taking it upon herself to circumvent the established forms of protection, in order to advance a political agenda.