Comey Slips Up

PUBLISHED: 1:00 PM 11 Dec 2018
UPDATED: 5:24 PM 11 Dec 2018

Comey Denies Knowing Who Hired Dossier Creator, Admits Knowing Dems Did?

In a stunning denial, James Comey told congressional investigators that he never knew who had hired Fusion GPS to create the dossier, but then fingered democrats, despite the fact that none of that information was included in the FISA warrants.

After denying he knew who'd hired Fusion GPS, despite singing three FISA warrants, it appears that Comey made a mistake and admitted he knew democrats were behind the research.

James Comey may have just hanged himself. In the transcripts of his testimony to congressional investigators, the former FBI Director claimed he had no knowledge that Fusion GPS was hired by a U.S. based firm to create the dossier.

This contradicts three times Comey signed FISA warrants, including the words “U.S. based law firm,” to spy on former Trump campaign advisor Carter Page.

The firm in question, Perkins Coie, allegedly funded Fusion GPS to conduct the ‘opposition’ work against Donald Trump, on behalf of Hillary Clinton and the DNC.

The result of those efforts, the now largely-discredited dossier, was the basis for all sorts of privacy intrusions conducted by the Obama administration.

The warrants Comey signed specifically stated the FBI “was approached by an identified U.S. person who indicated to Source #1 [Steele] that a U.S.-based law firm had hired the identified U.S. person to conduct research regarding Candidate #1’s ties to Russia.”

Comey’s statements related to Perkins Coie:

Mr. Trey Gowdy:  When did you learn that Fusion GPS was hired by Perkins Coie?

Mr. Comey:  I never learned that, certainly not while I was Director.

Mr. Gowdy:  Well, when did you learn the DNC had hired Perkins Coie?

Mr. Comey:  I never learned that. Again, while I was Director. I think I’ve read it in the media, but, yeah, even today, I don’t know whether it’s true.

Mr. Gowdy:  While you were the Director, you never knew that the DNC hired a law firm that hired an oppo research firm that hired Christopher Steele?

Mr. Comey:  No, I don’t think so. I don’t have any recollection of being told that or reading that or learning that while I was Director.

Comey was not asked to explain how he could sign three FISA warrants, but not know the details.

Mark Meadows later asked Comey to “explain his claim that he didn’t know Steele was being paid via Perkins Coie considering testimony from Comey’s own legal counsel, James Baker, was contacted by an attorney for Perkins Coie and was provided documents related to the Russia probe.”

Mr. Meadows: Let me ask one clarifying question, if you don’t mind. Director Comey, you were saying that you had no knowledge that Perkins Coie was actually involved with the Democrat National Committee and involved in this particular investigation that ultimately was initiated. Is that correct?

Mr. Comey:  I, when I was FBI Director, don’t remember ever being told anything about Perkins Coie. I think I’ve since read stuff in the media, but not when I was Director.

Mr. Meadows:  So are you saying that James Baker, your general counsel, who received direct information from Perkins Coie, did so and conveyed that to your team without your knowledge?

Mr. Comey:  I don’t know.

Mr. Meadows:  What do you mean you don’t know?  I mean, did he tell you or not?

Mr. Comey:  Oh, I — well —

Mr. Meadows:  James Baker, we have testimony that would indicate that he received information directly from Perkins Coie; he had knowledge that they were representing the Democrat National Committee and, indeed, collected that information and conveyed it to the investigative team. Did he tell you that he received that information from them? And I can give you a name if you want to know who he received it from.

Mr. Comey:  I don’t remember the name Perkins Coie at all.

Comey also slipped up by saying he was aware the dossier was financed by Democrats.

Yet, according to Democratic and Republican House Intelligence memos, “that information was not specifically included in the FISA application.”

Comey responded to questions about Steele’s political patrons by saying, “I thought he was retained as part of a Republican-financed effort — retained by Republicans adverse to Mr. Trump during the primary season, and then his work was underwritten after that by Democrats opposed to Mr. Trump during the general election season.”

“When did you learn that his work went from being financed by what you described as Republicans to what you described as Democrats?” Comey was questioned.

Comey replied, “I certainly learned of it before the end of October. And I think the filing that you’re referring to obliquely was at the end of October sometime. So, it was before that.”

“Comey’s FISA application to conduct surveillance did not specifically state that the FBI had information that Steele was being paid in connection with any U.S. political party, according to House documents.”

A House Intelligence Committee memo released last February documented that as FBI director, Comey signed three FISA applications to spy on Page with the dossier serving as part of the basis for the warrant requests.

The FISA application states Steele:

“was approached by an identified U.S. person who indicated to Source #1 [Steele] that a U.S.-based law firm had hired the identified U.S. person to conduct research regarding Candidate #1’s ties to Russia. (The identified U.S. person and Source #1 have a long-standing business relationship.) The identified U.S. person hired Source #1 to conduct this research. The identified U.S. person never advised Source #1 as to the motivation behind the research into candidate #1’s ties to Russia. The FBI speculates that the identified U.S. person was likely looking for information that could be used to discredit Candidate #1’s campaign.”

The entire cover up now is sickening, and many people hope that Comey can be caught for lying to congressional investigators.