Comey Interview Stuns

PUBLISHED: 4:33 PM 16 Dec 2019

Comey Defends Dossier, Interview Shows Freakish Skill In Falsehood, Dissembling

Everything Comey ‘argued’ during the interview contradicted (or deflected from) what Americans KNOW to be fact.

His ability to exist in another reality is quite scary. (Source: Fox News Screenshot)

James Comey, Obama’s FBI Director and the man responsible for helping deceive the FISA courts into running a spying operation against President Trump, admitted on “Fox News Sunday” that he was “wrong” and “overconfident” when defending the Bureau before the Inspector General’s report was released.

But, that’s not really news. The main takeaway from the interview seems to be Comey’s insatiable need to justify himself and deny the truth through further “mischaracterization, omissions, and Significant errors.”

For example, the dossier, which was completely debunked but still used as a “central role” in obtaining FISA warrants, Comey claimed was “not a huge part of the presentation” to the court.

And, there’s plenty more. Comey’s delusions of defense, many people argue, show either a very warped or unhinged mind.

Fox News reported:

[Comey said he was] “overconfident” when he defended his former agency’s use of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

This comes days after Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report and testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee detailed concerns that included 17 “significant errors and omissions” by the FBI’s investigative team when applying for a FISA warrant to monitor former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. Horowitz referred “the entire chain of command” to the FBI and DOJ for “how to assess and address their performance failures” during the probe, which was conducted while Comey was in charge.

“He’s right, I was wrong,” Comey said about how the FBI used the FISA process, adding, “I was overconfident as director in our procedures,” and that what happened “was not acceptable.”

Horowitz did make it clear that he believes the FBI’s investigation of Russian election interference and possible connections with the Trump campaign was properly initiated, but he did note that this is based on a “low threshold.” He also concluded that there was no testimonial or documentary evidence to show that the investigation started due to any political bias, but said the issue of bias “gets murkier” when it comes to the various issues with the FISA process.

That process included the reliance on information gathered by former British spy Christopher Steele as part of opposition research conducted by Fusion GPS for the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign. Horowitz’s report stated that government attorneys were hesitant to approve a FISA warrant application until they relied on unverified information from Steele. That information also was used in subsequent renewals for the FISA warrant.

Comey downplayed the role of Steele’s information in obtaining the FISA warrant against Page, claiming Sunday that it was “not a huge part of the presentation to the court,” just part of the information included in the warrant application.

He insisted that he and Horowitz “weren’t saying different things” about Steele’s significance, but host Chris Wallace then read Horowitz’s words, which said Steele’s information “played a central and essential role” in establishing probable cause.

Comey said he did not “see the disconnect” between his stance and Horowitz’s, even though he recognized that Steele’s reporting “was the one that convinced the lawyers” to move forward.

When Wallace accused him of minimizing the relevance of Steele’s information, Comey said, “if I was then I’m sorry that I did that.”

Another tense exchange occurred when Comey and Wallace accused each other of “mischaracterizing” the problems with Steele’s reporting. Comey claimed that the issue “were significant questions about the reliability of some of the sub-source reporting.”

Wallace then pointed out that according to Horowitz’s report, Steele’s Russian sub-source was not the problem. Rather, the sub-source told the FBI that Steele was the one misrepresenting his statements, demonstrating a lack of reliability.

Comey maintained “that doesn’t drive the conclusion that Steele’s reporting was bunk.”

In addition to the issues related to Steele, the FBI was found to have omitted exculpatory information about Page that could have impacted the judge’s decision in granting the FISA warrant. Included in this was an instance where an attorney was found to have altered an email to say that Page had not been a CIA source, when in fact he had been working with them. That information would have justified Page’s contacts with Russia, and its omission ultimately led to the FBI renewing the FISA warrant against Page.

In an April 2018 interview with MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, Comey claimed that the FISA process is “incredibly rigorous” and claimed that Republicans’ criticism of the Page FISA warrant was “a political deal” that was not “based in substance or law.”

Following the report’s release, Comey essentially claimed vindication, declaring in the wake of the report that the criticism of the bureau’s actions “was all lies.” When asked about vindication at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, the inspector general bluntly replied, “I think the activities we found here don’t vindicate anybody who touched this FISA.”

Comey explained that his claim of vindication was not in reference to the issues identified in Horowtiz’s report.

“What I mean is that the FBI was accused of treason, of illegal spying, of tapping Mr. Trump’s wires illegally, of opening an investigation without justification, of being a criminal conspiracy to unseat, defeat and then unseat a president. All of that was nonsense,” he said.

On Sunday, Comey claimed that the FBI did not intentionally commit wrongdoing, but described the FBI’s failures as “real sloppiness.” He said the Horowitz report “did not find misconduct by any FBI people,” rather just “mistakes and negligence.”

Wallace was quick to remind Comey that attorney Kevin Clinesmith was referred for criminal investigation for the doctored email. Comey said “that’s not been resolved.” He did say it was “fair” to say that the FBI provided false information to the FISA court.

A New York Post piece explained it like this:

Jim Comey is so adept at gaslighting that when you watch him being interviewed, he comes across as so plausible, you wonder if it’s you who has the inadequate grasp of reality.

But on Sunday, Fox News anchor Chris Wallace dragged the former FBI director into the real world by juxtaposing clips of his dishonest defense of the FBI’s doomed investigation of Donald Trump’s campaign alongside Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s recitation of the facts to Congress.

The problem for Comey is the facts damn him.

Oh, yes, he said yesterday, “I was wrong” and Horowitz was right.

But he admitted only to being “overconfident” in FBI procedures.

He tried to convince us it was just “sloppiness” when the FBI misled the court to spy on the Trump campaign using information it knew was false.

No one, not even scrupulously impartial Horowitz, believes the deception in the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign is mere accidental untidiness.

But Comey was at his most delusional defending the Steele Dossier, a farrago of rumor and fantasy that “played a central and essential role” in the FBI’s applications for warrants to spy on the campaign, according to Horowitz.

Oh, no, said Comey, it was part of a “broader mosaic of facts.”

But, said Wallace, the dossier is proven to be “bunk.”

Oh, no, said Comey. The FBI and Horowitz “didn’t conclude the reporting from Steele was bunk.” There were just “significant questions about the reliability of some of the sub-source reporting.”

In other words, it was bunk.

It is despicable for the former FBI boss to try breath life back into the Steele Dossier corpse which has done so much harm, but there was worse to come, when Comey tried to airbrush over a doctored e-mail Horowitz uncovered.

FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith altered the e-mail to reverse its meaning and then used it to bolster another surveillance warrant application against Carter Page, Horowitz found.

Comey airily described it as “this business with the lawyer changing some e-mail to a partner on the team.”

He did admit Page was “treated unfairly,” but he was more concerned about the FBI’s reputation. Comey wants us to believe that “the American people, especially [Fox] viewers … were given false information about the FBI.”

“I hope people will stare at that and learn about what the FBI is like, human and flawed, but deeply committed to trying to do the right thing,” he said.

This is how Comey sees himself, too, as a man of integrity who only ever sought to do the right thing.

But his idea of the right thing was to save the American people from themselves. In other words, to protect America from Donald Trump, a man he viewed as “fundamentally dishonest,” as he told Horowitz in a previous report, when he tried to justify leaking details of a private conversation with the president to the New York Times, via a friend.

Comey’s delusions of grandeur drove him into “noble cause” corruption, which is corruption, nonetheless, and just as damaging.

He and his band of handpicked agents had convinced themselves Trump was a danger to the country and probably a Russian agent.

They cherry-picked evidence that confirmed their assumptions and discarded evidence that refuted it. It was a classic case of confirmation bias, which should have no place in law enforcement. It is how innocent people go to jail.